No matter your age, a full head of hair is crucial to your confidence. A follicular unit excision or FUE hair transplant in Ann Arbor, MI can effectively restore lost hair and boost your self-image. But hearing about NeoGraft and ARTAS and their use in FUE might raise various questions. By learning more about NeoGraft and ARTAS, you can answer your inquiries and explore your hair transplant options with sufficient knowledge.
Both NeoGraft and ARTAS are specialized devices from the same manufacturer that assist physicians in FUE hair transplant. These solutions automate the process of extracting hair follicles from your scalp and help your surgeon successfully implant them to restore your hairline. While these devices cut down the time it takes for your hair transplant procedure, they carry some disadvantages as compared to the latest hair transplant technology.
To help you learn more about these factors, here is a guide on the difference between NeoGraft and ARTAS as well as a comparison with more advanced hair transplant solutions.
What Is NeoGraft?
NeoGraft is a purpose-built device that automates the process of hair extraction from your scalp in order to use these grafts in your hair transplant. NeoGraft is an advanced solution that not only extracts hair grafts with higher precision, but it also stores them with minimal damage. The technology is not as advanced as some newer solutions that are now available. However, the NeoGraft device still delivers significant benefits for reducing the time it takes to complete your hair transplant surgery.
What Is ARTAS?
ARTAS is one of the only robotic hair extraction devices that helps plastic surgeons in the process of extracting hair grafts for hair transplants. It comes with specific advantages such as the use of robotics for convenient and precise hair extraction. But in addition to causing side effects, such as noticeable scarring with shorter hair styles, ARTAS is surpassed by more advanced solutions that offer better benefits with fewer drawbacks.
What Are the Differences Between NeoGraft and ARTAS?
When comparing NeoGraft and ARTAS, you need to remember that both of these solutions come from the same manufacturer, Venus Concept. Both options are widely used by different hair transplant surgery providers. Each of these solutions has their pros and cons, with their suitability for patients depending on a case-to-case basis.
Before you explore the difference between NeoGraft and ARTAS, learning about the similarity of these systems can help you a great deal with understanding their efficacy, benefits, and shortcomings.
To summarize, both NeoGraft and ARTAS automate the process of extracting hair grafts, which cuts down the time it takes for plastic surgeons to manually extract each graft by hand to deliver a natural-looking hairline.
The difference between these solutions marks a major contrast in how they perform their tasks. Where NeoGraft uses automation to a great degree, it still requires a surgeon to operate the device during the hair extraction phase. ARTAS operates as a robotic arm that identifies which areas to extract the hair grafts from before performing the procedure all by itself. Typically, ARTAS only requires your plastic surgeon to program the device before it begins extracting hair grafts. With that being said, both NeoGraft and ARTAS require a surgeon’s manual skill for implanting the extracted hair grafts.
NeoGraft and ARTAS also differ in the rate of failure for implanted grafts. NeoGraft hair implants have a slightly higher chance of growing fully after the transplant as compared to implants that are performed through ARTAS. At the same time, while both NeoGraft and ARTAS leave tiny scars at the location of hair grafts, the puncture marks left by ARTAS are more noticeable.
But that’s not all. ARTAS may carry the advantage of being highly automated, but it only delivers its best results on dark-haired patients. If you have blond or any other light shade of hair, ARTAS may not provide you with the results that it may offer for others. With that, ARTAS is ideal for patients who need high hair volume, while NeoGraft works well for patients with low hair volume. In addition, NeoGraft works better on curly hair than ARTAS.
If you are concerned about costs, the next point of comparison for NeoGraft and ARTAS might catch your interest. Despite having certain drawbacks as compared to NeoGraft, ARTAS treatments are typically more expensive due to their use of robotic te